Melvin v. Troy University et al
| Nick Melvin |
| Troy University, Luke Ritter, Scout Blum and Jack Hawkins, Jr. |
| 2:2021cv00475 |
| July 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Kelly F Pate |
| Myron H Thompson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
REPLY BRIEF re #17 Response to Motion filed by Scout Blum, Jack Hawkins, Jr, Luke Ritter, Troy University. (Baker, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 17
RESPONSE to Motion re #12 Consolidated MOTION to Dismiss filed by Nick Melvin. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Burdick, Austin)
|
|
Filing 16
Case reassigned to Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson and Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate. Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate no longer assigned to the case as presiding judge. (djy, )
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by the plaintiff as to why #12 Motion to Dismiss should not be granted; Show Cause Response due by 9/1/2021; defendants may file a reply by 9/8/2021; counsel for the parties are directed to complete the appropriate attached form and send to the clerk by 9/8/2021, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 8/18/2021. (djy, )
|
|
Motions No Longer Referred to Judge Pate: #12 Consolidated MOTION to Dismiss (djy, )
|
|
Filing 14
BRIEF in Support re #12 Consolidated MOTION to Dismiss filed by Scout Blum, Jack Hawkins, Jr, Luke Ritter, Troy University. (Baker, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Defendants Scout Blum, Jack Hawkins, Jr., Luke Ritter, & Troy University. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 12
Consolidated MOTION to Dismiss by Scout Blum, Jack Hawkins, Jr, Luke Ritter, Troy University. (Baker, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 11
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Troy University. (Baker, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 10
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Jack Hawkins, Jr. (Baker, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 9
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Luke Ritter. (Baker, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 8
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Scout Blum. (Baker, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas Joseph Cervera on behalf of Scout Blum, Jack Hawkins, Jr, Luke Ritter, Troy University (Cervera, Nicholas) Modified on 8/12/2021 to remove as filed on behalf of "All Defendants" & to list them individually (amf, ).
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Michael Baker on behalf of Scout Blum, Jack Hawkins, Jr, Luke Ritter, Troy University (Baker, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Plaintiff Nick Melvin. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 4
Return Receipt Card showing service of summons, complaint and corporate disclosure signed by COVID19 for Luke Ritter served on 7/23/2021, answer due 8/13/2021. (djy, )
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Scout Blum, Jack Hawkins, Jr, Luke Ritter, Troy University and mailed CMRRR with copy of complaint and corporate disclosure. (djy, )
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Nick Melvin. (djy, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Scout Blum, Jack Hawkins, Jr, Luke Ritter, Troy University ( Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number 4602063983.), filed by Nick Melvin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 fee receipt)(djy, )
|
|
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Nick Melvin. (NO PDF document attached to this notice-See Docket entry #1 ). (djy, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
