Brackins et al v. SoClean, Inc.
| Paul Brackins, Rosetta Dejarnett, Shelly Key and Jonathan Griffin |
| SoClean, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00651 |
| September 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Emily C Marks |
| Myron H Thompson |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by SoClean, Inc.. (Tompkins, Jason) |
Filing 12
ORDER: It is ORDERED that defendant's unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to the complaint (Doc. #9 ) is granted, and the deadline for defendant to file a response to the complaint, currently 11/4/2021,is extended to 21 days after the Judicial Panel on MDL rules upon a pending request to consolidate this action with others in a multidistrict litigation proceeding. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/22/2021. (es, )
|
| Filing 11 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to SoClean, Inc.; Corporate Disclosures due by 11/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order & Sample Format)(es, ) |
| Filing 10 Case Reassigned to Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson as presiding judge. Chief Judge Emily C. Marks no longer assigned to the case. (es, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer as to #1 Complaint, by SoClean, Inc.. (Burkhart, Charles) Modified on 10/22/2021 to correct event code used for docketing to extension of time to answer (qc/djy, ). |
| Filing 8 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint signed by Rashad Dickinson for SoClean, Inc. served on 10/14/2021, answer due 11/4/2021. (es, ) |
| Filing 7 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Jonathan Griffin re #2 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (Hamil, Jubal) |
| Filing 6 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Shelly Key re #2 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (Hamil, Jubal) |
| Filing 5 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Rosetta Dejarnett re #2 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (Hamil, Jubal) |
| Filing 4 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Paul Brackins re #2 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (Hamil, Jubal) |
| ***PURSUANT TO THE #9 MOTION - Attorney Jason Brent Tompkins for SoClean, Inc. added. (NO PDF attached to this entry) (am, ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SoClean, Inc.; and mailed CMRRR with copy of #1 Complaint. (hfc, ) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Paul Brackins, Rosetta Dejarnett, Shelly Key, & Jonathan Griffin; Corporate Disclosures due by 10/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 standing order & format)(djy, ) |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against SoClean, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number 4602064815.), filed by Shelly Key, Paul Brackins, Rosetta Dejarnett, Jonathan Griffin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 fee receipt)(djy, ) Modified on 10/5/2021 to clarify text to reflect as CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT (qc/djy, ). |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Paul Brackins, Rosetta Dejarnett, Jonathan Griffin, Shelly Key. (NO PDF document attached to this notice-See docket entry #1 ). (djy, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
