Bolton v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
Timothy Bolton and Timothy Franklin Bolton |
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Hugh Hood, Michael Borwicz, Alabama Department of Corrections and Tai Q. Chung |
2:2021cv00721 |
October 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
R Austin Huffaker |
Kelly F Pate |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Timothy Franklin Bolton. (am, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER: it is ORDERED that by 12/7/2021, Plaintiff must submit an inmate account statement reflecting the average monthly balance and average monthly deposits to his account from April 2021 through September 2021, as further set out in Order; DIRECTING the Clerk to provide a copy of this Order to the inmate account clerk at the facility where Plaintiff is detained, as further set out in Order. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 11/16/2021. (Furnished: Account Clerk @ ECF)(am, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Timothy Bolton. (bll, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Alabama Department of Corrections, Michael Borwicz, Tai Q. Chung, Hugh Hood, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., filed by Timothy Bolton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(bll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.