Robinson v. Chilton County Courthouse et al (INMATE 2)
| Tabeus Dewayne Robinson |
| Chilton County Courthouse and Walter Hayden |
| 2:2021cv00786 |
| November 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Emily C Marks |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
No objections received re #4 Recommendation. (No PDF attached to this entry) (bes, )
|
|
Filing 4
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: the undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS this case be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), as further set out in order; Objections to R&R due by 1/5/2022. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 12/21/2021. (bes, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER ON MOTION granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at Chilton Co Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 12/16/2021. (Furn: Cashier) (bes, )
|
|
Filing 2
Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Tabeus Dewayne Robinson. (hrs, )
|
|
Filing 1
Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Chilton County Courthouse, Walter Hayden, filed by Tabeus Dewayne Robinson.(hrs, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
