Thornton v. Walgreen Co., Inc.
Stacy Thornton |
Walgreen Co., Inc. |
2:2022cv00149 |
March 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Stephen Michael Doyle |
Myron H Thompson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 41. Signed by Debra P. Hackett, Clerk on June 21, 2022. (am, ) |
Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION for Dismissal by Walgreen Co., Inc. & Stacy Thornton. (Clark, John) Modified on 6/21/2022 to add joint filer & clarify text (am, ). |
Filing 8 Case reassigned to Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson as Presiding judge and Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle as referral judge; Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle no longer assigned to the case as presiding judge. (am, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Compliance with Court #5 Order by Walgreen Co., Inc. (Clark, John) Modified on 5/27/2022 to clean up text. (dmn, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER: It is ORDERED that any party wishing to provide such consent must complete the form and submit it to the Clerk of Court by 5/23/2022; Any party wishing to submit the reassignment form must mail it to the above address by 5/23/2022. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 5/2/2022. (amf, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER: It is ORDERED that the parties shall file their Rule 26(f) report as soon as practicable; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/30/2022, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 5/2/2022. (amf, ) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Walgreen Co., Inc..(Clark, John) |
Filing 3 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Walgreen Co., Inc.. (Clark, John) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Plaintiff Stacy Thornton, and counsel for Defendant Walgreen Co., Inc. (dmn, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walgreen Co., a corporation, incorrectly designated in the Complaint as Walgreen Co., Inc. from Circuit Court of Elmore County, Alabama, case number 29-CV-22-900053.00. ( Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number 4602066381) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 State Court Complaint, #4 Filing Fee Receipt, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (dmn, ) |
COMPLAINT against Walgreen Co., Inc., filed by Stacy Thornton.(dmn, ) (no pdf, see Doc. #1 ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Walgreen Co., Inc. (dmn, ) (no pdf, see Notice of Removal, Doc. #1 ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Stacy Thornton. (dmn, ) (no pdf, see Complaint, Doc. #1 ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thornton v. Walgreen Co., Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Stacy Thornton | |
Represented By: | Carson Scott Hale |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Walgreen Co., Inc. | |
Represented By: | Bradley Johns Smith |
Represented By: | John Wesley Clark, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.