Mitchell v. Town of Hayneville, Alabama
Kelvin Mitchell |
Town of Hayneville, Alabama |
2:2022cv00198 |
April 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Kelly F Pate |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 0207 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 TEXT ORDER granting #12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 6/9/2022. (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, ) |
Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply re #6 MOTION to Dismiss by Town of Hayneville, Alabama. (Hyde, Robbie) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Kelvin Mitchell. (Smith, Ashley) Modified on 6/9/2022 to clarify the docket text (amf, ). |
Filing 10 ORDER: it is ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a response by 6/8/2022, and show cause why the #6 motion to dismiss should not be granted; Defendant may file a reply by 6/15/2022; DIRECTING counsel for the parties to complete the appropriate attached form and send it to the Clerk by 6/15/2022. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 5/25/2022. (amf, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Defendant Town of Hayneville, Alabama. (amf, ) |
Filing 8 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Town of Hayneville, Alabama. (Hyde, Robbie) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM Brief in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Town of Hayneville, Alabama. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Amended Complaint in previous case, #2 Exhibit B, Answer to Amended Complaint in previous case)(Hyde, Robbie) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Town of Hayneville, Alabama. (Hyde, Robbie) |
Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons & #1 Complaint, signed by Susie Smith for Town of Hayneville, Alabama, served on 5/2/2022, answer due 5/23/2022. (amf, ) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Town of Hayneville, Alabama; mailed by CMRRR with copy of #1 Complaint. (amf, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Plaintiff Kelvin Mitchell. (amf, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement filed by Kelvin Mitchell. (amf, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Town of Hayneville, Alabama (Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number 4602066650), filed by Kelvin Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt)(amf, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury filed by Kelvin Mitchell. (No PDF attached to this entry - See doc #1 for PDF) (amf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mitchell v. Town of Hayneville, Alabama | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kelvin Mitchell | |
Represented By: | Ashley Nicole Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Town of Hayneville, Alabama | |
Represented By: | Robbie Alexander Hyde |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.