Vaughn v. Chilton County Judicial System et al (INMATE 2)
| Reget Vaughn |
| Chilton County Judicial System and Chilton County |
| 2:2022cv00290 |
| May 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #5 & #6 Orders sent to Reget Vaughn were returned with the following notation, "Return to sender, attempted - not known, unable to forward.: (NO pdf attached to this entry) (cwl, ) |
| Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #4 Order sent to Reget Vaughn was returned with the following notation, "Return to sender, refused, unable to forward." (NO pdf attached to this entry) (cwl, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER: it is ORDERED that by 6/16/2022, Plaintiff must file with the Court a current address or show cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to adequately prosecute this action. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 6/6/2022. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: It is ORDERED that the 6/2/2022, Order (Doc. #4 ) be and is hereby WITHDRAWN. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 6/6/2022. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing 4
(WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S #5 ORDER) ORDER: it is ORDERED that by 5/13/2022, Plaintiff must file with the Court a current address or show cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to adequately prosecute this action, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 6/2/2022. (cwl, ) Modified on 6/6/2022 (cwl, ).
|
| Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #3 Order & form sent to Reget Vaughn were returned with the following notation, "Return to sender, refused, unable to forward, out of jail". (No pdf attached to this entry) (cwl, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: it is ORDERED that by 6/1/2022, Plaintiff must either pay the $52.00 administrative fee and $350.00 filing fee or file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with a prison account statement from the inmate account clerk, as further set out in order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to (1) provide Plaintiff with an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and (2) provide a copy of this Order to the inmate account clerk at the facility where Plaintiff is detained. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 5/18/2022. (furn: cashier) (form mailed as directed; order mailed to Chilton County Jail Acct Clerk)(cwl, )
|
| Filing 2 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Chilton County, Chilton County Judicial System, filed by Reget Vaughn. (NO IFP; NO FILING FEE)(cwl, ) |
|
Filing 1
Order entered in 2:22-cv-00285-ECM-SRW: the Clerk of this Court is DIRECTED to: 1) Open separate civil actions for each Plaintiff named in this Complaint and assign the present cause of action to Plaintiff Tabeus Robinson; 2) Assign the newly opened cases in accordance with this Court's normal assignment procedures. 3) Place a copy of the Complaint, including any and all attachments (Doc. 1), to which the newly opened civil action is assigned, and a copy of this Order in the newly opened case files. 4) Refer these case files to the appropriate Magistrate Judge for further proceedings upon completion of the foregoing directives. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 5/12/2022. (cwl, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
