Hein v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
Plaintiff: Blair Thomas Hein
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, Mrs. Jane, Mr. Hampton, C.O. Siller and Christopher Gordy
Case Number: 2:2022cv00301
Filed: May 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Stephen Michael Doyle
Referring Judge: Myron H Thompson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Special Report to #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint by Mr. Hampton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1)(Piggott, Philip) Modified on 7/14/2022 to add link. (es, ).
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying without prejudice #10 Motion to File Special Report Under Seal. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 7/8/2022. (wcl, )
July 1, 2022 Opinion or Order AO FORM 85 mailed to counsel for Mr. Hampton. (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, )
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to File Special Report Under Seal by Mr. Hampton. (Piggott, Philip)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Mr. Hampton. (Piggott, Philip)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Mr. Hampton.(Piggott, Philip)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Mr. Hampton. Mr. Hampton waiver sent on 6/29/2022, answer due 8/29/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Piggott, Philip)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Mail Returned as Undeliverable; Copy of the #4 ORDER sent to Mr. Hampton was returned with the following notation, "Return To Sender, Attempted - Not Known, Unable to Forward." (No PDF attached to this entry) (es, )
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Mail Returned as Undeliverable; Copy of the #4 ORDER sent to Mrs. Jane was returned with the following notation, "Return To Sender, Attempted - Not Known, Unable to Forward." (No PDF attached to this entry) (es, )
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint & #4 Order, signed by Sharon Blakely for Christopher Gordy, served on 6/15/2022, answer due 7/25/2022. (amf, )
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint & #4 Order, signed by Sharon Blakely for C.O. Siller, served on 6/15/2022, answer due 7/25/2022. (amf, )
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT AND ANSWER by 7/25/2022; copies mailed to plf; copies mailed with #1 Complaint to ALDOC General Counsel, Alabama Attorney General and General Counsel for Wexford Health Sources, Inc.; mailed by CMRRR with #1 Complaint to individuals named dfts. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 6/13/2022. (wcl, )
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ON MOTION granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Easterling Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 6/6/2022. (furn: cashier) (wcl, )
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Blair Thomas Hein. (Attachments: #1 IFP Declaration)(bll, )
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Alabama Department of Corrections, Christopher Gordy, Mr. Hampton, Mrs. Jane, C.O. Siller, filed by Blair Thomas Hein.(bll, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hein v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Blair Thomas Hein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mrs. Jane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. Hampton
Represented By: Philip Piggott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C.O. Siller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Gordy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?