Britton v. Davis et al (INMATE 1)
| Fernandez Britton, Jr. |
| Lt. Davis and Officer Todd |
| 2:2022cv00321 |
| May 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Kelly F Pate |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Lt. Davis, Officer Todd. (Harmon, Bart) |
| Filing 11 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Lt. Davis, Officer Todd re #7 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (McCarthy, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Michael McCarthy on behalf of Lt. Davis, Officer Todd (McCarthy, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Lynn Dodd Smithee on behalf of Lt. Davis, Officer Todd (Smithee, Stephanie) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Special Report & Answer and that the deadline for Dfts to file their Special Report and Answer is extended to 8/15/2022. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 7/20/2022. (wcl, )
|
| Filing 7 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Lt. Davis, Officer Todd; Corporate Disclosures due by 8/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Attachment)(wcl, ) |
| AO FORM 85 mailed to counsel for Lt. Davis, Officer Todd. (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, ) |
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time for Filing Special Report & Answer re #4 Order to File Special Report and Answer by Lt. Davis, Officer Todd. (Harmon, Bart) Modified on 7/14/2022 to clarify text as to pleading (es, ). |
| Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #5 Return Receipt Card; Service package containing #4 Order and #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint sent CMRRR to Lt. Davis was returned with the following notation, "Return To Sender, Not Deliverable As Addressed, Unable To Forward." (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, ) |
| Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint and #4 Order signed by Mary M. for: Lt. Davis served on 6/8/2022, answer due 7/14/2022; Officer Todd served on 6/8/2022, answer due 7/14/2022. (wcl, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT AND ANSWER by 7/14/2022; copies mailed to plf; copies mailed with complaint to ALDOC General Counsel and Alabama Attorney General; mailed by CMRRR with complaint to named dfts. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 6/2/2022. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at Fountain Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 6/2/2022. (furn: cashier) (wcl, )
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Fernandez Britton, Jr.. (hrs, ) Modified on 5/27/2022 to properly reflect the Plaintiff's name (amf, ). |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Lt. Davis, Officer Todd, filed by Fernandez Britton, Jr.. (hrs, ) Modified on 5/27/2022 to properly reflect the Plaintiff's name (amf, ). |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Fernandez Britton, Jr. .(No PDF document attached - see docket entry #1 ). (hrs, ) Modified on 5/27/2022 to properly reflect the Plaintiff's name (amf, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
