Scott v. Yelder et al (INMATE 1)
Royal Dean Scott |
Traves Yelder and T. Weary |
2:2022cv00364 |
June 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
W Harold Albritton |
Stephen Michael Doyle |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MOTION to Withdraw Complaint by Royal Dean Scott. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(bes, ) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time by Royal Dean Scott. (bes, ) |
![]() |
Filing 12 NOTICE to the Court by Royal Dean Scott (bes, ) |
Filing 11 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Royal Dean Scott. (bes, ) |
![]() |
Filing 9 MOTION to Subpoena ADOC Records and Files by Royal Dean Scott. (bes, ) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Reconsideration re #5 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel by Royal Dean Scott. (bes, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Royal Dean Scott (bes, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Royal Dean Scott (bes, ) |
![]() |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint an Attorney by Royal Dean Scott. (bes, ) |
![]() |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Royal Dean Scott. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Document)(hrs, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against T. Weary, Traves Yelder, filed by Royal Dean Scott.(hrs, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.