Little v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
| Eric Leonard Little |
| State of Alabama and Karen Carter |
| 2:2022cv00429 |
| July 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| R Austin Huffaker |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: DIRECTING that by 9/21/2022, Petitioner must file an amendment to his Petition stating sufficient factual allegations in support of his speedy trial claim, as further set out in Order. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 8/29/2022. (am, )
|
| Filing 4 OBJECTIONS to #3 Recommendation of The Magistrate Judge by Eric Leonard Little. (am, ) |
| Filing 3 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that: 1. The petition (Doc. #1 ) be DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) be DENIED as moot. 3. This case be CLOSED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a copy of this Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 8/16/2022. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 8/2/2022. (dmn, ) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Eric Leonard Little. (bll, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eric Leonard Little.(bll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
