Jacobs v. Chilton County Jail (INMATE 3)
Arthur Lee Jacobs |
Chilton County Jail |
2:2022cv00447 |
August 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
W Harold Albritton |
Stephen Michael Doyle |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Chilton Co. Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 9/13/2022. (Furn: Cashier) (bes, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED that by 8/30/2022, Plf must file an amended complaint, as further set out in order; the Clerk is DIRECTED to provide him with a copy of the form used by prisoners to file 1983 actions. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 8/16/2022. (bes, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER: it is ORDERED that by 8/17/2022, Plf shall either (1) file a prison account statement from the account clerk at the institution where he is detained showing the average monthly balance in his prison account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint and the average monthly deposits to his account during the past 6 months, or (2) remit payment of the $402 filing and administrative fees. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 8/16/2022. (bes, ) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Arthur Lee Jacobs. (bes, ) |
Filing 4 Condition by Arthur Lee Jacobs (bes, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER: it is ORDERED that by 8/17/2022, Plf shall either (1) file a prison account statement from the account clerk at the institution where he is detained showing the average monthly balance in his prison account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint and the average monthly deposits to his account during the past 6 months, or (2) remit payment of the $402 filing and administrative fees. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 8/3/2022. (bes, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Arthur Lee Jacobs. (bll, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Chilton County Jail, filed by Arthur Lee Jacobs.(bll, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/1/2022 to include received stamp) (QCed/bes, bll). Modified on 8/1/2022 (bes, ). |
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Arthur Lee Jacobs. (No PDF document attached see docket entry #1 ). (bll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jacobs v. Chilton County Jail (INMATE 3) | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Arthur Lee Jacobs | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Chilton County Jail | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.