Dean v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 4)
Brian Scott Dean |
Chilton County Jail, Chilton County Judicial System, City of Clanton, City of Jemison, City of Maplesville and City of Thorsby |
2:2022cv00452 |
August 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
W Harold Albritton |
Chad W Bryan |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Order entered on this date by the undersigned, it is the ORDER and DECREE of the Court that Judgment is entered in favor of the Dfts and against the Plf and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice; The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(es, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) The #5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 3) No costs are taxed; A separate Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/27/2022. (es, ) |
No objections filed to the #5 Recommendation. (No pdf attached to this entry) (cwl, ) |
Mail Returned as Undeliverable; Copy of #5 Recommendation sent to Brian Scott Dean returned with the following USPS notation, "Return to Sender; Not Deliverable as Addressed; Unable to Forward; RTS: Not Here (handwritten)." (NO PDF attached to this entry) (es, ) |
Filing 5 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: the undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 9/20/2022. Signed by Honorable Judge Chad W. Bryan on 9/6/2022. (cwl, ) |
Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #4 Order sent to Brian Scott Dean was returned with the following USPS notation, "Return to Sender, Refused, Unable to Forward, Out of Jail." (No PDF attached with this entry) (es, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER: it is ORDERED that Plf must file notice of his current address with the court no later than 8/30/2022; Plf is informed that if he fails to respond to this Order the Magistrate Judge will recommend that this case be dismissed. Signed by Honorable Judge Chad W. Bryan on 8/16/2022. (es, ) |
Mail Returned as Undeliverable; Copy of #3 Order & form sent to Brian Scott Dean returned with the following USPS notation, "Return to Sender; Refused; Unable to Forward; Not in Jail." (NO PDF attached to this entry) (am, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER: it is ORDERED that by 8/17/2022, Plf shall file either the $402.00 filing and administrative fees or an affidavit in support of a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; DIRECTING the Clerk to furnish Plf with a copy of the form affidavit used by persons seeking to proceed in forma pauperis, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Chad W. Bryan on 8/3/2022. (es, ) |
Filing 2 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Chilton County Jail, Chilton County Judicial System, City of Clanton, City of Jemison, City of Maplesville, City of Thorsby, filed by Brian Scott Dean. (NO IFP; NO FILING FEE)(es, ) |
Filing 1 Copy of Order entered in 2:22-cv-209-MHT-JTA severing case and directing that a new civil action be opened for this plaintiff, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams on 8/1/2022 (es, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.