Smith v. Subway Inc. et al (MAG+)
Plaintiff: Peter J. Smith
Defendant: Subway Inc., RSA Union Building and Mike Campbell
Case Number: 2:2022cv00479
Filed: August 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Chad W Bryan
Referring Judge: Stephen Michael Doyle
2 Judge: R Austin Huffaker
3 Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (AO239 Long Form) by Peter J. Smith. (wcl, )
August 29, 2022 Filing 6 Conflict Disclosure Statement re #2 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement, filed by Peter J. Smith. (am, )
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: it is ORDERED that, on or before 9/8/2022, Plaintiff shall either pay the requisite filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, along with the long-form application; DIRECTING the Clerk to provide Plaintiff with the appropriate documents so that he may apply for in forma pauperis status if he so desires. Signed by Honorable Judge Chad W. Bryan on 8/19/2022. (mailed w/IFP)(am, )
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: It is ORDERED that the above-styled action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 for further proceedings and determination or recommendation as may be appropriate. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/18/2022. (am, )
August 16, 2022 Filing 3 Case reassigned to Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins as presiding judge and Honorable Judge Chad W. Bryan as referral judge; Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr, Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle no longer assigned to the case. (am, )
August 15, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Peter J. Smith; Corporate Disclosures due by 8/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order & Sample)(am, )
August 11, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mike Campbell, RSA Union Building, Subway Inc., filed by Peter J. Smith. (NO FILING FEE/NO IFP)(am, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Subway Inc. et al (MAG+)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter J. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Subway Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RSA Union Building
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?