Carroll v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
Plaintiff: Sha'Ronn Carroll
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 2:2022cv00537
Filed: September 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Kelly F Pate
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, and #4 Order signed by illegible for the Attorney General of the United States, served on 10/27/2022. (bes, )
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Return Receipt Card showing service of the Summons, #1 Complaint, and #4 Order signed by Social Security Administration for Kilolo Kijakazi, served on 10/25/2022. (bes, )
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Return Receipt Card showing service of the Summons, #1 Complaint, and #4 Order signed by Social Security Administration, served on 10/25/2022. (bes, )
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, and #4 Order signed by E. Anderson for US Attorney's Office served on 10/24/2022, answer due 1/22/2023. (bes, )
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by counsel for Kilolo Kijakazi. (es, )
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by counsel for (plf) Sha'Ronn Carroll. (es, )
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi, U.S. Attorney, Social Security Office of General Counsel Program Litigation Office 5, and U.S. Attorney General; mailed CMRRR with a copy of the #1 Complaint and #4 Order. (bes, )
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting the #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDER TO ANSWER Social Security Complaint within 90 days after the date of service of the complaint; plf to file brief in support within 40 days of filing of the answer; dft's reply brief and administrative record due within 30 days of brief filing. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 10/21/2022. (bes, )
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Choi on behalf of All Defendants (Choi, Sarah)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sha'Ronn Carroll. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(bll, )
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by Sha'Ronn Carroll. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 12/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bll, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carroll v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sha'Ronn Carroll
Represented By: Micki Beth Stiller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: Sarah Elizabeth Choi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?