Chester v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
Phillip Chester |
Kilolo Kijakazi |
2:2022cv00538 |
September 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Chad W Bryan |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by Social Security Administration for Kilolo Kijakazi, served on 9/28/2022. (amf, ) |
Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge filed by counsel for Plaintiff Phillip Chester. (es, ) (Main Document 10 replaced on 10/6/2022) (es, ). |
Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge e-filed by counsel for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (es, ) (Main Document 9 replaced on 10/6/2022) (es, ). |
Filing 8 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #3 Order & #4 Summons signed by No Signature for Social Security Office of General Counsel Program Litigation Office served on 9/9/2022. (es, ) |
Filing 7 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #3 Order & #4 Summons signed by Emily Sase for U.S. Attorney General served on 9/22/2022. (es, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Choi on behalf of All Defendants (Choi, Sarah) |
Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #3 Order & #4 Summons signed by E. Andersen for U.S. Attorney served on 9/16/2022, answer due 12/15/2022 for Kilolo Kijakazi. (es, ) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General, & Social Security Office of General Counsel Program Litigation Office 5; mailed by CMRRR with #1 Complaint & #3 Order. (amf, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; ORDER TO ANSWER Social Security Complaint within 90 days after the date of service of the complaint; plaintiff to file brief in support within 40 days of filing of the answer; defendant's reply brief and administrative record due within 30 days of brief filing. Copies mailed to counsel. Signed by Honorable Judge Chad W. Bryan on 9/15/2022. (amf, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Phillip Chester. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(hrs, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by Phillip Chester. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 12/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(hrs, ) Modified on 9/13/2022 to reflect the correct date filed (amf, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chester v. Kijakazi (CONSENT) | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Phillip Chester | |
Represented By: | Micki Beth Stiller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
Represented By: | Sarah Elizabeth Choi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.