Wilkerson v. Cohen et al (INMATE 1)
| Cardarius Wilkerson |
| Alan Cohen, FPC Montgomery and United States of America |
| 2:2022cv00552 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Jerusha T Adams |
| Emily C Marks |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: the undersigned RECOMMENDS this case be DISMISSED without prejudice; It is further ORDERED that, on or before November 23, 2022, the parties may file objections to this Recommendation. Signed by Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams on 11/8/2022. (es, )
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: it is ORDERED that, by 10/6/2022, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file an affidavit in support of a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by relevant financial information from the inmate account clerk; The Clerk is DIRECTED to (1) provide Petitioner with an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) provide a copy of this Order to the inmate account clerk at the facility where Petitioner is detained Signed by Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams on 9/22/2022. (Mailed to plf w/ IFP & MFPC acct clerk as directed)(es, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Cardarius Wilkerson. (NO IFP; NO FILING FEE)(hrs, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
