Sheridan v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
| Darius Sheridan |
| Blake Turman and Thomas Hugghins |
| 2:2022cv00628 |
| October 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| W Harold Albritton |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: it is ORDERED that by 12/14/2022, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint, as further set out in order; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court is to provide him with a copy of the form used by prisoners to file 1983 actions. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 11/30/2022. (Mailed to plf w/ 1983 form) (es, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: GRANTING #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at Covington County Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 11/30/2022. (Furn: Cashier) (es, )
|
|
Filing 2
Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Darius Sheridan. (hrr, )
|
|
Filing 1
Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Thomas Hugghins, Blake Turman, filed by Darius Sheridan.(hrr, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
