Howard v. Posey et al (INMATE 1)
| Brandon Christopher Howard |
| Lt. Posey, Rolanda Calloway, Captain Nolin, Lt. Wavier and Sgt. Sanders |
| 2:2022cv00643 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| W Harold Albritton |
| Charles S Coody |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: It is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is DENIED as further set out in the order. 2. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he must submit the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee to the Clerk of this Court on or before 12/29/2022. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 12/15/2022. (dmn, )
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Brandon Christopher Howard. (bld, ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 11/3/2022 to include date received stamp) (amf, ). Modified on 11/3/2022 (amf, ). |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Rolanda Calloway, Captain Nolin, Lt. Posey, Sgt. Sanders, Lt. Wavier, filed by Brandon Christopher Howard. (Attachments: #1 Written Statement)(bld, ) Modified on 11/4/2022 to include description of attachment. (dmn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
