Guilford v. Protective Insurance Company
Berneice Guilford |
Protective Insurance Company |
2:2022cv00654 |
November 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Chad W Bryan |
Emily C Marks |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED that the Plf shall file a response to the Dft's #2 motion to dismiss on or before 1/16/2023; It is further ORDERED that the Dft shall file a reply to the Plf's response on or before 1/23/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 12/22/2022. (bes, ) |
Filing 8 Case Reassigned to Chief Judge Emily C. Marks as presiding Judge. Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins no longer assigned to the case. (cwl, ) |
Filing 7 Case reassigned to Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins as presiding judge and Honorable Judge Chad W. Bryan as referral judge. Honorable Judge Chad W. Bryan no longer assigned to the case as presiding judge. (bes, ) |
Motions No Longer Referred: #2 MOTION to Dismiss (No PDF attached to this entry) (bes, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER: the parties are hereby DIRECTED to complete and return the appropriate form so that it is received by the Clerk on or before 11/29/2022, as further set out in Order; Do NOT electronically file the consent form nor the reassignment form into the record. Signed by Honorable Judge Chad W. Bryan on 11/15/2022. (bes, ) |
Filing 5 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Protective Insurance Company. (Duncan, Joseph) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (ALL PARTIES) Berneice Guilford, Protective Insurance Company. (bes, ) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Honorable Judge Chad W. Bryan as presiding judge. (bes, ) |
COMPLAINT against Protective Insurance Company, filed by Berneice Guilford.(No PDF attached to this entry - see doc #1 -1 for PDF)(bes, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss by Protective Insurance Company. (Duncan, Joseph) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Protective Insurance Company from Circuit Court of Montgomery County, AL, case number 03-cv-22-901249.00. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AALMDC-3320051) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record)(Duncan, Joseph) Modified on 11/14/2022 to clarify docket text (bes, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/14/2022 to remove civil cover sheet from main PFG)(Additional attachment(s) added on 11/14/2022: #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (bes, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Guilford v. Protective Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Protective Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Joseph Robert Duncan, Jr. |
Represented By: | Anna Alyce Eastburn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Berneice Guilford | |
Represented By: | Charles James, II |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.