Lloyd v. Price et al (INMATE 3)
Orvel Winston Lloyd |
Phillip A. Price, Phillip L. Calhoun and Jason L. Calhoun |
2:2023cv00053 |
January 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Stephen Michael Doyle |
Myron H Thompson |
Mandamus & Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 1437. (amf, ) |
Filing 3 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Orvel Winston Lloyd. (dmn, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER: it is ORDERED that by February 9, 2023, Plaintiff shall either (1) pay the $402 filing and administrative fees or (2) file a properly completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a prison account statement from the account clerk at the facility where Plaintiff is detained; the Clerk is DIRECTED to (1) provide Plaintiff with the form for application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and (2) provide a copy of this order to the inmate account clerk at the facility where Plaintiff is detained. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 01/26/2023.(furnished: cashier) (IFP form mailed as directed) (amf, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Jason L. Calhoun, Phillip A. Price, filed by Orvel Winston Lloyd.(NO IFP; NO FILING FEE) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(zhp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.