Howard et al v. Bombardier Recreational Products et al
Plaintiff: Kareem Howard and Lamesa Howard
Defendant: Bombardier Recreational Products and Homewood Motorcycles, Inc. doing business as Big #1 Motorsports
Case Number: 2:2023cv00066
Filed: February 1, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Kelly F Pate
Nature of Suit: Tort Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (ALL PARTIES) Bombardier Recreational Products, Homewood Motorcycles, Inc., Kareem Howard, Lamesa Howard (cwl, )
February 1, 2023 Filing 4 Case Assigned to Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate. (cwl, )
February 1, 2023 Filing 3 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Bombardier Recreational Products. (Ingram, Xan)
February 1, 2023 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Bombardier Recreational Products.(Ingram, Xan)
February 1, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Bombardier Recreational Products from Circuit Court of Autauga County, Alabama, case number 04-CV-2022-900143. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AALMDC-3361003) , filed by Bombardier Recreational Products. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Filing, #3 Exhibit B - Memorandum Opinion, #4 Exhibit C - Affidavit of William Joseph Belmont)(Ingram, Xan)
February 1, 2023 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Bombardier Recreational Products, Homewood Motorcycles, Inc., filed by Kareem Howard, Lamesa Howard. (no pdf attached - see doc #1 -2 for pdf)(cwl, )
February 1, 2023 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Homewood Motorcycles, Inc. (no pdf attached - see doc #1 -2 for pdf)(cwl, )
February 1, 2023 NOTICE of Filing to State Court by Bombardier Recreational Products re #1 Notice of Removal (no pdf attached - see doc #1 for pdf)(cwl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howard et al v. Bombardier Recreational Products et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kareem Howard
Represented By: Carshala Youse
Represented By: Robert Edwin Riddle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lamesa Howard
Represented By: Carshala Youse
Represented By: Robert Edwin Riddle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bombardier Recreational Products
Represented By: Xan Peyton Ingram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Homewood Motorcycles, Inc. doing business as Big #1 Motorsports
Represented By: Cassandra Harris Kalupa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?