Lewis v. ARC of Montgomery
| Daucus Lewis |
| ARC of Montgomery |
| 2:2023cv00195 |
| April 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| R Austin Huffaker |
| Kelly F Pate |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/12/2024 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 2D before Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker Jr.; Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4/5/2024; Jury Selection & Trial set for 6/3/2024 at 10:00 AM in Montgomery, AL before Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker Jr.; Dispositive & Daubert Motions due by 12/14/2023; Mediation Notice due by 11/21/2023; Amended Pleadings due by 8/7/2023; Discovery due by 11/14/2023, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 5/23/2023. (Furn: Calendar, dh) (bes, )
|
|
Filing 16
STANDARD BRIEFING ORDER setting out further briefing requirements, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 5/23/2023. (bes, )
|
| Filing 15 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Dukes, Carter) |
| Filing 14 Case reassigned to Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr as presiding judge and Magistrate Judge Kelly F. Pate as referral judge; Magistrate Judge Kelly F. Pate no longer assigned to the case as presiding judge. (am, ) |
| Filing 13 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by ARC of Montgomery re #8 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (Dukes, Carter) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Correction re #10 Conflict Disclosure Statement, to correct main pdf previously attached by e-filer. (Attachments: #1 Corrected Main Document #10 )(am, ) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: The parties were previously notified of the assignment of this case to a Magistrate Judge and the right to request reassignment (see attached notice). The parties should now confirm the decision to consent or request reassignment in writing by completing the appropriate attached form. The completed form should be sent to the Clerk of Court by 5/24/2023. Alternatively, as explained in the attached notice, a party may consent electronically, but neither the consent form nor the request for reassignment form should be filed electronically. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kelly F. Pate on 5/3/2023. (dmn, )
|
| Filing 10 Conflict Disclosure Statement by Daucus Lewis re #9 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (Tomlinson, John) (Main Document 10 replaced on 5/4/2023 to correct main pdf previously attached by e-filer & clarify text) (am, ). |
| Filing 9 SECOND Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Plaintiff Daucus Lewis; Corporate Disclosures due by 5/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order and Sample Format)(amf, ) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Defendant ARC of Montgomery; Corporate Disclosures due by 5/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order and Sample Format)(amf, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Defendant ARC of Montgomery. (amf, ) |
| ***PURSUANT TO THE #6 ANSWER - Attorney Christian Collier Feldman for Defendant ARC of Montgomery added. (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, ) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER with JURY DEMAND to #1 Complaint by ARC of Montgomery.(Dukes, Carter) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to ARC of Montgomery;NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (amf, ) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Plaintiff Daucus Lewis; Corporate Disclosures due by 4/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Attachment)(amf, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Plaintiff Daucus Lewis. (amf, ) |
| Filing 2 Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Kelly F. Pate. (amf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against ARC of Montgomery ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AALMDC-3411055.), filed by Daucus Lewis; 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 7/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Tomlinson, John) Modified on 4/7/2023 to include jury demand, to remove as filed on behalf of "all plaintiffs", & to list as filed on behalf of the individual plaintiff (amf, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lewis v. ARC of Montgomery | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daucus Lewis | |
| Represented By: | John Everett Tomlinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ARC of Montgomery | |
| Represented By: | Christian Collier Feldman |
| Represented By: | Carter Hurd Dukes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
