Peacock v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
| Caleb Peacock |
| Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett |
| 2:2023cv00241 |
| April 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Charles S Coody |
| Myron H Thompson |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable #4 Recommendation sent to Caleb Peacock, "Return to sender not deliverable as addressed unable to forward." (No PDF attached) (hrr, )
|
|
Filing 6
JUDGMENT it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. #4 ) is adopted. This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice for failure to follow a court order to pay a filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. No costs are taxed. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed.. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(hrr, )
|
|
Filing 5
OPINION. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/16/2023. (hrr, )
|
|
No objections filed to the #4 Recommendation. (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, )
|
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #3 Order sent to Account Clerk at Covington Co. Jail was returned with the following notation: "Return to Sender, Inmate no longer incarcerated in our facility". (No PDF attached to this entry)(amf, )
|
|
Filing 4
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: the undersigned RECOMMENDS this case be DISMISSED without prejudice; Objections to R&R due by 6/2/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody on 5/19/2023. (amf, )
|
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #3 Order & Application IFP sent to Caleb Peacock were returned with the following notation: "Return to Sender, Attempted - Not Known, Unable to Forward" (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: it is ORDERED that, on or before 5/16/2023, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with a prison account statement, as further set out in order; DIRECTING the Clerk to (1) provide Plaintiff with an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and (2) provide a copy of this Order to the inmate account clerk at the facility where Plaintiff is detained. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody on 5/2/2023. (Furnished: Cashier) (IFP form mailed as directed) (Copy mailed to account clerk at Covington Co. Jail as directed)(amf, )
|
|
Filing 2
Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Vikki Boyett, Thomas Hugghins, Blake Turman, filed by Caleb Peacock. (NO IFP; NO FILING FEE) (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(amf, )
|
|
Filing 1
ORDER, entered in 2:23-CV-193-ECM-KFP: DIRECTING the Clerk as follows: 1) Assign the present cause of action to Plaintiff Darius Sheridan; 2) Open separate civil actions for each remaining plaintiff named in the Complaint; 3) Place a copy of the Complaint and all attachments and a copy of this Order in each newly opened civil action; and 4) Assign the newly opened cases in accordance with the Court's normal assignment procedures. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kelly F. Pate on 4/26/2023.(amf, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
