Stephens v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
Plaintiff: Matthew Stephens
Defendant: Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Case Number: 2:2023cv00268
Filed: April 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Charles S Coody
Referring Judge: R Austin Huffaker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to file the filing fee or an application seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the accompanying account information in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1)(A) as ordered by this court. Objections to R&R due by 6/23/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/9/2023. (cwl, ) (Main Document 4 replaced on 6/9/2023 to correct a document number on the PDF) (cwl, ).
May 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: it is ORDERED that by May 25, 2023, Plaintiff must either pay the $52.00 administrative fee and $350.00 filing fee or file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with a prison account statement, as further set out in order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to (1) provide Plaintiff with an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and (2) provide a copy of this Order to the inmate account clerk at the institution where Plaintiff is incarcerated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody on 5/11/2023. (furn: cashier) (order and form mailed as directed)(cwl, )
April 26, 2023 Filing 2 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Vikki Boyett, Thomas Hugghins, Blake Turman, filed by Matthew Stephens. (NO IFP; NO FILING FEE) (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(cwl, )
April 26, 2023 Filing 1 Copy of ORDER entered in 2:23-CV-193-ECM-KFP severing case and directing a new civil action be opened for this plf, as further set out in order. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Kelly F. Pate on 4/26/2023. (cwl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stephens v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blake Turman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Hugghins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vikki Boyett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?