Maloy v. BBVA USA Bancshares, Inc. (MAG+)
| Nathaniel Maloy |
| BBVA USA Bancshares, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00377 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Emily C Marks |
| Kelly F Pate |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received email from ND/AL regarding receipt of e-transfer case; ND/AL case number assigned as 2:23-cv-00941 (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, ). |
Filing 7
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the #5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 7/20/2023. (cwl, )
|
| Case transferred to Northern District of Alabama. Electronically transferred via CM/ECF to Clerk. (cwl, ) |
| No objections received re #5 Recommendation. (No PDF attached to this entry) (bes, ) |
| Filing 6 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Nathaniel Maloy re #4 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (bes, ) |
|
Filing 5
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS this case be TRANSFERRED to the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama under 28 USC 1391(b) and 28 USC 1406(a), as further set out in order; Objections to R&R due by 7/6/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kelly F. Pate on 6/22/2023. (bes, )
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Plaintiff Nathaniel Maloy; Corporate Disclosures due by 6/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order and Sample Format)(amf, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: it is ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 USC 636, this case is hereby REFERRED to the United States Magistrate Judge for all pretrial proceedings and entry of any orders or recommendation as may be appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 6/14/2023. (amf, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nathaniel Maloy. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(bes, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/26/2023: #2 Corrected Signature Page) (bes, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BBVA USA Bancshares, Inc., filed by Nathaniel Maloy. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 9/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bes, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/26/2023: #2 Corrected Signature Page) (bes, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Maloy v. BBVA USA Bancshares, Inc. (MAG+) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nathaniel Maloy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BBVA USA Bancshares, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
