Dickerson et al v. Noland Hospital et al (MAG+)
Kenita Dickerson and Madesa Dickerson |
Noland Hospital and State of Alabama |
2:2023cv00388 |
June 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Chad W Bryan |
Myron H Thompson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED that the #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chad W. Bryan on 6/22/2023. (am, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to the United States Magistrate Judge for consideration and disposition or recommendation on all pretrial matters as may be appropriate. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/21/2023. (cwl, ) |
Filing 4 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Kenita Dickerson, Madesa Dickerson. Corporate Disclosures due by 7/3/2023. (Attachments: #1 Conflict Statement Standing Order and Sample Format)(cwl, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Parties regarding service material. (cwl, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenita Dickerson, Madesa Dickerson. (cwl, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Noland Hospital, State of Alabama (Filing fee $ 402, receipt #2496), filed by Kenita Dickerson, Madesa Dickerson. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 9/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 receipt)(cwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.