Cunningham v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
| Dewayne Cunningham and Dewayne Scott Cunningham |
| John Q. Hamm, David Lamar, Lt. Randolph, Officer Darham and Officer Parham |
| 2:2023cv00564 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Charles S Coody |
| Myron H Thompson |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the #11 motion is GRANTED and that the deadline for Defendants to file their Answer and Special Report is extended to 12/19/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/7/2023. (am, )
|
| Filing 13 AO FORM 85 sent to counsel for John Q. Hamm, David Lamar, Officer Parham, Lt. Randolph. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: If the parties wish to consent to the jurisdiction of a US Magistrate Judge, counsel is required to print, sign and mail this form to all parties/counsel in this case. This form should not be returned to the Clerk's Office unless all parties have consented. (cwl, ) |
| Filing 12 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by John Q. Hamm, David Lamar, Officer Parham, Lt. Randolph. (Howell, Laura) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Special Report & Answer by John Q. Hamm, David Lamar, Officer Parham, Lt. Randolph. (Howell, Laura) |
| Filing 10 Return Receipt card showing service as to #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint & #5 Order, signed by Karen Browning, Steven T. Marshall (Alabama AG) served on 9/27/2023. (am, ) |
| Filing 9 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint & #5 Order signed by Barbara Baldwin for John Q. Hamm served on 9/28/2023, answer due 11/7/2023; General Counsel for ADOC served on 9/28/2023. (am, ) |
| Filing 8 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint & #5 Order signed by Latoria Jacks for David Lamar served on 9/28/2023, answer due 11/7/2023. (am, ) |
| Filing 7 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint & #5 Order signed by Latoria Jacks for Lt. Randolph served on 9/28/2023, answer due 11/7/2023. (am, ) |
| Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint & #5 Order signed by Latoria Jacks for Officer Parham served on 9/27/2023, answer due 11/7/2023. (am, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT AND ANSWER by 11/7/2023; copies mailed to plaintiff; mailed by CMRRR with #1 complaint to named defendants, General Counsel for the ADOC, and the AG for the State of AL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody on 9/26/2023. (am, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; GRANTING Plaintiff's #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Bullock. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody on 9/26/2023. (Furnished: Cashier; A/C @ BCF) (am, )
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Dewayne Scott Cunningham. (hrr, ) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Dewayne Scott Cunningham. (hrr, ) Modified on 9/26/2023 to correct file date(hrr, ). |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Officer Parham, John Q. Hamm, David Lamar, Lt. Randolph, filed by Dewayne Scott Cunningham. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(hrr, ) Modified on 9/26/2023 to correct defendant name (am, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
