King v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
Edward Lavar King |
John Q. Hamm, Sheryl Price, Alabama Department of Corrections, State of Alabama, Joseph H. Headley and Charles McKee |
2:2023cv00624 |
October 26, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Chad W Bryan |
Emily C Marks |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Amended Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against John Q. Hamm, Sheryl Price, Joseph H. Headley, Charles McKee, filed by Edward Lavar King.(ggn, ) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 9 Initial Partial Filing fee received: $8.13, receipt number 3677. (ggn, ) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Time Extension by Edward Lavar King. (am, ) |
![]() |
Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Edward Lavar King. (ggn, ) |
Filing 5 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Edward Lavar King. (ggn, ) |
![]() |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Copies by Edward Lavar King. (am, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Edward Lavar King. (tps) Modified on 10/27/2023 to remove incorrectly attached document (am, ). |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm, Sheryl Price, State of Alabama filed by Edward Lavar King.(tps) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/27/2023 to add PDF with envelope) (hrr, ). Modified on 10/27/2023 to add dft name(hrr, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.