Holifield v. Hamm et al (INMATE 3)
| Eric Lamar Holifield |
| John Q. Hamm and Cheryl Price |
| 2:2023cv00729 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| R Austin Huffaker |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $9.83 be paid on or before January 9, 2024; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Donaldson Correctional Facility. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 12/19/2023. (furn: cashier) (cwl, )
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Eric Lamar Holifield. (BLD) (Main Document 3 replaced on 12/19/2023 to add case number to PDF) (cwl, ). |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Eric Lamar Holifield. (BLD) |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against John Q. Hamm, Cheryl Price, filed by Eric Lamar Holifield.(BLD) Modified on 12/19/2023 to correct def Price's name (cwl, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
