Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al (INMATE 2)
William N. Lucy |
Securus Technologies, K. Albritton, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus, President of Securus and Chief Executive Officer of Securus |
2:2023cv00742 |
December 26, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Charles S Coody |
R Austin Huffaker |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 OBJECTION to #3 Recommendation by William N. Lucy. (BES) |
Received Email from ALSD regarding receipt of e-transfer case; ALSD case number assigned as 1:24-CV-00028. (NO PDF attached to this entry). (Entered 01/31/2024) (GGN) |
![]() |
Case transferred to District of Alabama Southern. Electronically transferred via CM/ECF to Clerk. (NO PDF attached to this entry) (GGN) |
Filing 5 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by William N. Lucy. (DMN) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Add Defendants by William N. Lucy. (BES) |
![]() |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by William N. Lucy. (BLD) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against K. Albritton, Securus Technologies, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus, Chief Executive Officer of Securus, President of Securus filed by William N. Lucy.(BLD) Modified on 12/27/2023 to include jury demand (BES). Modified on 1/3/2024 to add securus dfts per staff attorney (BES). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.