Sales v. Butler et al (INMATE 4)
| Jeremy Jerette Sales |
| Pamela Butler, Sgt. Walker, Ms. Steele, Lt. Calvin and Lt. Everidge |
| 2:2024cv00050 |
| February 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Charles S Coody |
| R Austin Huffaker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice; Objections to R&R due by 3/29/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/15/2024. (AM) |
Filing 2
ORDER: it is ORDERED that by March 4, 2024, Plaintiff shall file either the $405.00 filing and administrative fees or an affidavit in support of a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by relevant financial information from the inmate account clerk. The CLERK is DIRECTED to furnish him with a copy of the form affidavit used by persons seeking to proceed in forma pauperis before this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/16/2024. (furn: cashier) (form mailed as directed)(CWL)
|
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Pamela Butler, Lt. Calvin, Lt. Everidge, Ms. Steele, Sgt. Walker, filed by Jeremy Jerette Sales. (NO IFP; NO FILING FEE)(TPS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
