Fonville v. Koch Foods (MAG+)
| Debranetta R. Fonville |
| Koch Foods |
| 2:2024cv00068 |
| February 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Myron H Thompson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: the undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that this case be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and abide by court orders without prejudice, as further set out in order; Objections to R&R due by 4/19/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 4/5/2024. (BES)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: It is ORDERED that, on or before March 28, 2024, Plaintiff shall show cause, if any there be, why her case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to abide by court orders. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 3/14/2024. (c/s) (LAB)
|
| Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of the #4 Order and IFP form returned UNSIGNED for Debranetta R. Fonville, served on NO DATE PROVIDED. (BES) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Debranetta R. Fonville's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP. The undersigned is unable to determine whether Fonville is eligible to proceed IFP and therefore requires her to amend her Motion by completing and submitting the Court's long-form application. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that, on or before 3/4/2024, Fonville shall amend her pending motion for leave to proceed IFP by completing and filing the Court's long-form application for leave to proceed IFP. The Clerk's Office is directed to provide Fonville with a copy of the long-form application along with this Order via CMRRR. Alternatively, Fonville may remit the filing fee in full. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 2/12/2024. Copy with long-form application for IFP mailed to Plaintiff CMRRR as directed. (DMN)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE: it is ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 USC 636, this case is referred to the US Magistrate Judge for consideration and disposition or recommendation on all pretrial matters as may be appropriate. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/9/2024. (BES)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Debranetta R. Fonville. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(BES) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Koch Foods, filed by Debranetta R. Fonville. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Charge of Discrimination Letter, #2 Proposed Summons)(BES) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fonville v. Koch Foods (MAG+) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Debranetta R. Fonville | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Koch Foods | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
