State of Alabama et al v. Durham
| State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections |
| Gregory Durham |
| 2:2024cv00069 |
| February 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| R Austin Huffaker |
| Kelly F Pate |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received email from ALND regarding receipt of e-transfer; ALND case number assigned as 2:24-mc-00280. (LAB) |
Filing 7
ORDERED: It is ORDERED that the motion to transfer #1 is GRANTED.The Clerk is DIRECTED to take all steps necessary to effectuate transfer of this case to the Southern Division of the Northern District of Alabama. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kelly F. Pate on 3/6/2024. (LAB) Modified text on 3/13/2024 (LAB).
|
| Case transferred to Northern District of Alabama. Electronically transferred via CM/ECF to Clerk. (LAB) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: The Court's previous #4 Order contained an error stating that Plf, rather than Dft Gregory Durham, must file a response to the motion to transfer this case to the Northern District of Alabama. To correct this error, it is ORDERED that Dft Gregory Durham must file a response to the motion to transfer by 2/28/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kelly F. Pate on 2/21/2024. (BES)
|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to Motion re #1 MOTION to Compel MOTION for Order TO TRANSFER MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION TESTIMONY filed by United States. (Cheek, Jason) Modified on 2/16/2024 to add link (CWL). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer, it ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a response by February 28, 2024, showing cause why this case should not be transferred to the Northern District of Alabama. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kelly F. Pate on 2/14/2024. (CWL)
|
| Filing 3 Case Assigned to Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr., as presiding Judge and Magistrate Judge Kelly F. Pate as referral Judge. (CWL) (Main Document 3 replaced on 2/9/2024 to correct case number on PDF) (CWL). |
| Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Alabama Department of Corrections, State of Alabama. (no pdf attached - see doc #1 -2 for pdf) (CWL) |
| MOTION to Compel Deposition Testimony of Non-Party Gregory Durham (AIS# 319530) and MOTION to Transfer Motion to Compel to Issuing Court by Alabama Department of Corrections, State of Alabama. (no pdf attached - see doc #1 for pdf) (CWL) |
| Filing 2 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #1 MOTION to Compel Deposition Testimony of Non-Party Gregory Durham (AIS# 319530) and MOTION to Transfer Motion to Compel to Issuing Court filed by Alabama Department of Corrections, State of Alabama. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Subpoena, #2 Exhibit B - Proof of Service, #3 Exhibit C - Transcript) (Lunsford, William) Modified on 2/9/2024 to correct link language (CWL). |
| Filing 1 (STRICKEN. E-FILED BY ATTORNEY UNDER INCORRECT EVENT) COMPLAINT Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony against Gregory Durham ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BALMDC-3581497.), filed by State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 5/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Conflict Disclosure Statement) (Lunsford, William) (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/9/2024 to lock down fillable PDF) (CWL). Modified on 2/9/2024 to remove duplicative text (CWL). Modified on 2/9/2024 (CWL). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
