In the Matter of the Appointment of Johnathan S. Ross as United States Attorney
| In the Matter of the Appointment of Johnathan S. Ross as United States Attorney |
| 2:2024mc04020 |
| April 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Emily C Marks |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 1
ORDER OF APPOINTMENT: Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 546(d), Jonathan S. Ross is appointed as the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, effective April 28, 2024. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 4/16/2024. (HRR)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In the Matter of the Appointment of Johnathan S. Ross as United States Attorney | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Not yet classified: In the Matter of the Appointment of Johnathan S. Ross as United States Attorney | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
