Murphy v. Montgomery County Detention Facility et al (MAG+)
| Rosie Lee Murphy |
| Montgomery County Detention Facility, Naph Care, Lieutenant Lane, Sergeant Johnson, Officer Williams, Nurse Dunaway, Sergeant Knight, Nurse Bloctan, Nurse Gordon and Officer Operton |
| 2:2025cv00527 |
| July 16, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Emily C Marks |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 30 NOTICE to the Courts by Rosie Lee Murphy (HRR) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE - Letter by Rosie Lee Murphy (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(HRR) |
| Filing 28 Letter by Rosie Lee Murphy (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(HRR) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE to Court: On Going Retaliation by Rosie Lee Murphy (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(HRR) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE to Court by Rosie Lee Murphy (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(HRR) |
| Filing 25 MOTION for: Supplement/Add on Complaint by Rosie Lee Murphy. (HRR) (Main Document 25 replaced on 12/4/2025) (HRR). (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/4/2025: #1 Supporting Documents) (HRR). |
| Filing 24 Temporary NOTICE of Change of Address and Phone Number by Rosie Lee Murphy (HRR) |
Filing 23
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the stay of service previously imposed is lifted. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve Murphy's amended complaint on the named defendants. To enable the Clerk to proceed with service of process, it is further ORDERED that, on or before October 31, 2025, Murphy shall file with the Clerk's Office one proposed summons per defendant. Murphy is warned that if she does not provide the necessary service materials by that time, the undersigned will recommend that her case be dismissed for failure to abide by orders of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 10/20/2025. (HRR)
|
| Filing 22 STRICKEN - Entered in the incorrect case in Clerical Error Modified on 10/9/2025 (HRR). (Main Document 22 replaced on 10/9/2025) (HRR). |
| Filing 21 NOTICE to Pro Se Party - Service Material re #18 Amended Complaint. (HRR) |
| Filing 20 Amended Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Rosie Lee Murphy. (HRR) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER: it is ORDERED that Murphy's Motion to Amend (Doc. #18 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to docket the filing as Murphys Amended Complaint. It is further ORDERED that Murphy's previous Motions to Amend (Docs. #14 and #15 ) are DENIED as MOOT. Murphy is advised that the Court will review her Amended Complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915. No further action is necessary from Murphy at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 9/10/2025. (HRR)
|
| PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S #19 ORDER - AMENDED COMPLAINT against Montgomery County Detention Facility, Naph Care, filed by Rosie Lee Murphy. (no pdf - see doc #18 )(HRR) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Rosie Lee Murphy. (HRR) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order (doc. #16 ) is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that this case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/9/2025. (HRR)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Rosie Lee Murphy. (HRR) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Amend the #1 Complaint by Rosie Lee Murphy. (BES) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Rosie Lee Murphy. (HRR) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE to the Court by Rosie Lee Murphy (HRR) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: it is ORDERED that Murphy's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. #8 ), Motions to Supplement Pleadings (Docs. #9 , #11 ), and Motion for Sanctions (Doc. #10 ) are DENIED. It is further ORDERED that, on or before September 5, 2025, Murphy shall file an amended complaint that complies with Rules 8, 10, and 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as further set out in order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 8/22/2025. (HRR)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Supplement Pleading by Rosie Lee Murphy. (HRR) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Sanctions by Rosie Lee Murphy. (HRR) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Supplement Pleading by Rosie Lee Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(HRR) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Rosie Lee Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(HRR) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to stay service of this case pending the undersigned's review of Plf's complaint under 28 USC 1915(e). Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 7/25/2025. (BES)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, to the United States Magistrate Judge for all pretrial proceedings and entry of any orders or recommendations as may be appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 7/21/2025. (CWL)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro Se Party-Service Material re: Defendant Naph Care. (AM) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons for Montgomery County Detention Facility. (AM) |
| Filing 3 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Rosie Lee Murphy. (AM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rosie Lee Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Application)(AM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Montgomery County Detention Facility, Naph Care, filed by Rosie Lee Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(AM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
