Cherch v. Johnson (INMATE 1)
Plaintiff: Kenneth Melvin Cherch
Defendant: Mandy Johnson
Case Number: 2:2026cv00421
Filed: May 29, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Jerusha T Adams
Referring Judge: Bill Lewis
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2026 Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Kenneth Melvin Cherch. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Document)(HRR)
May 29, 2026 Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Mandy Johnson, filed by Kenneth Melvin Cherch.(HRR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cherch v. Johnson (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Melvin Cherch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mandy Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?