Kelly v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Gregory Kelly |
| Ford Motor Company and Stivers Ford Lincoln Car Dealership |
| 2:2026cv00536 |
| June 29, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Myron H Thompson |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER: Denying the MOTION for a New Trial and MOTION for Injunctive Relief (Doc #6 ). Entered by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/22/2026. (HRR)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for a New Trial and MOTION for Injunctive Relief by Gregory Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(BES) |
|
Filing 5
SUMMARY-DISMISSAL ORDER: it is ORDERED that the #1 complaint, and this case in its entirety, are summarily dismissed without prejudice; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/9/2026. (AM)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Gregory Kelly. (HRR) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of the pro se party by Gregory Kelly. (HRR) |
| Filing 2 INFORMATION of the pro se party by Gregory Kelly. (HRR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Ford Motor Company, Stivers Ford Lincoln Car Dealership (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number 11240.), filed by Gregory Kelly. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 9/28/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Receipt)(HRR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
