Dunamis Medical Technologies, LLC et al v. Harmos Consulting, LLC et al
| Dunamis Medical Technologies, LLC, Dunamis Medical Technologies Inc. and Dunamis Medical LLC |
| Harmos Consulting, LLC and Forrest Samuel |
| 2:2026cv00556 |
| July 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Chad W Bryan |
| Emily C Marks |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER: Plaintiffs shall respond to the Defendants' #19 motion on or before September 14, 2026. It is further ORDERED that the Defendants shall file replies to the Plaintiffs' response on or before September 21, 2026. Signed by District Judge Emily C. Marks on 8/31/2026. (CWL)
|
| Filing 20 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Harmos Consulting, LLC, Forrest Samuel. (Clapp, James) |
| Filing 19 MOTION to Stay or in the Alternative to Dismiss or Transfer by Harmos Consulting, LLC, Forrest Samuel. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Affidavit Declaration of Forrest Samuels, #3 Appendix Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Exhibit 1- Complaint, #5 Exhibit 2- Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit 3- Motion to Transfer) (Clapp, James) |
Filing 18
ORDER: The parties' joint motion to extend the Defendants' responsive pleading deadline and to stay proceedings, (doc. #17 ), is GRANTED as to the request for an extension and DENIED in all other respects. The Defendants shall file a responsive pleading or motion on or before August 28, 2026. Signed by District Judge Emily C. Marks on 7/24/2026. (CWL)
|
| Filing 17 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Dunamis Medical LLC, Dunamis Medical Technologies Inc., Dunamis Medical Technologies, LLC, Harmos Consulting, LLC, Forrest Samuel. (Cochran, Ryan) Modified filers on 7/24/2026 (CWL). Added MOTION to Stay on 7/24/2026 (CWL). |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by James F. Clapp on behalf of Harmos Consulting, LLC, Forrest Samuel (Clapp, James) |
Filing 15
ORDER: The motion to admit pro hac vice, (doc. #14 ), is GRANTED, and Attorney James F. Clapp is ADMITTED to appear before this Court pro hac vice to represent the Defendants in this action, as further set out. Signed by District Judge Emily C. Marks on 7/21/2026. (CWL)
|
| Filing 14 Motion for James F. Clapp to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number AALMDC-4103861.) by Harmos Consulting, LLC, Forrest Samuel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Good Standing) (Mills, Wallace) Modified text on 7/21/2026 (CWL). |
| Filing 13 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Forrest Samuel. (Mills, Wallace) |
| Filing 12 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Harmos Consulting, LLC. (Mills, Wallace) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Wallace Damon Mills on behalf of Harmos Consulting, LLC, Forrest Samuel (Mills, Wallace) |
| ***Attorney James F. Clapp for Harmos Consulting, LLC, Forrest Samuel added. (CWL) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by James P. Flynn on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Flynn, James) |
Filing 9
ORDER: the motion to admit pro hac vice, (doc. #8 ), is GRANTED, and Attorney James Flynn is ADMITTED to appear before this Court pro hac vice to represent the Plaintiffs in this action. Attorney James Flynn shall file a notice of appearance with the Court. Signed by District Judge Emily C. Marks on 7/14/2026. (CWL)
|
| Filing 8 Motion for James Flynn to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number AALMDC-4098973.), by Dunamis Medical LLC, Dunamis Medical Technologies Inc., Dunamis Medical Technologies, LLC. (Cochran, Ryan) Modified text on 7/13/2026 (CWL). (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/13/2026: #1 Exhibit A) (CWL). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dunamis Medical Technologies, LLC, Dunamis Medical Technologies Inc., Dunamis Medical LLC. Harmos Consulting, LLC served on 7/8/2026. (Cochran, Ryan) Modified text on 7/13/2026 (CWL). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dunamis Medical Technologies, LLC, Dunamis Medical Technologies Inc., Dunamis Medical LLC. Forrest Samuel served on 7/8/2026. (Cochran, Ryan) Modified text on 7/13/2026 (CWL). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Pro Hac Vice as to James Flynn (CWL) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Harmos Consulting, LLC, Forrest Samuel. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (CWL) |
| Filing 3 Case Assigned to District Judge Emily C. Marks as presiding Judge and Magistrate Judge Chad W. Bryan as referral Judge. (CWL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Harmos Consulting, LLC, Forrest Samuel ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AALMDC-4096429.), filed by Dunamis Medical Technologies, LLC, Dunamis Medical Technologies Inc., Dunamis Medical LLC. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 10/5/2026. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A to Plaintiffs' Complaint, #3 Exhibit B to Plaintiffs' Complaint, #4 Exhibit C to Plaintiffs' Complaint, #5 Exhibit D to Plaintiffs' Complaint, #6 Exhibit E to Dunamis Complaint, #7 Exhibit F to Dunamis Complaint, #8 Exhibit G to Plaintiffs' Complaint, #9 Forrest Samuel Summons, #10 Harmos Consulting, LLC Summons) (Cochran, Ryan) Modified to renumber DE number and add jury demand on 7/7/2026 (HRR). |
| Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Dunamis Medical LLC, Dunamis Medical Technologies Inc., Dunamis Medical Technologies, LLC. (Cochran, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.