Griggs v. Stewart et al (INMATE2)
Derwin T. Griggs |
Tommy Spradlin, Clay Stewart, Tommy Simms and Keisha McCoy |
3:2007cv00691 |
July 30, 2007 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Opelika Office |
Elmore |
Myron H. Thompson |
Susan Russ Walker |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint and 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tommy Simms, Keisha McCoy, Tommy Spradlin, Clay Stewart, that: 1. Defendants 10 Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED to the extent Defendants see k dismissal of this case due to Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy previously available to him at the Chambers County Jail. 2. This case be DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a) for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy available to him during his confinement in the Chambers County Jail. Objections to R&R due by 6/5/2009. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 5/22/2009. (dmn) |
Filing 3 ORDER directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Elmore Correctional Facility. Signed by Judge Susan Russ Walker on 7/31/2007. (dmn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.