Toler v. Jones (INMATE 1)
Plaintiff: Kenneth Knight Toler
Defendant: Jay Jones
Case Number: 3:2008cv00077
Filed: February 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Opelika Office
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: Wallace Capel
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to provisions of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Objections to R&R due by 2/21/2008. Signed by Judge Wallace Capel Jr. on 2/7/2008. (wcl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Toler v. Jones (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Knight Toler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jay Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?