Frye et al v. Ulrich GMBH & Co. KG et al
Richard Edward Frye and Frauke Shephard-Frye |
Ulrich GMBH & Co. KG and Ulrich Medical USA, INC |
3:2008cv00158 |
March 6, 2008 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office |
Macon |
Susan Russ Walker |
Susan Russ Walker |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as followes: (1)Ulrich GmbH's 51 Motion to Reconsider, or in the Alternative, Motion to Certify for Interlocutory Appeal is DENIED with respect to the motion to reconsider and GRANTED with respect to the motion to certify for interlocutory appeal; and (2) The plaintiffs' 55 Motion to Deny 51 Motion to Reconsider, or in the Alternative, Motion to Deny Motion to Certify for Interlocutory Appeal is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/11/2010. (cb, ) |
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) that def's 4 motion to dismiss is granted and all claims against Ulrich USA are DISMISSED without prejudice; (2) that def's 5 motion to quash is GRANTED and the purported service of process on Ulrich GmbH is QUASHED; and (3) plfs shall effect service of process on Ulrich GmbH in compliance with the Hague Convention and the FRCP on or before 6/30/09, as further set out in order. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/25/09. (djy, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.