Coggins v. Town of Jackson's Gap (MAG+)
Plaintiff: Gene Coggins
Defendant: Town of Jackson's Gap
Case Number: 3:2009cv00065
Filed: January 26, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Chambers
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER DENYING plf's 15 MOTION to Clarify ; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Mag Judge that this action be DISMISSED for plf's failure to pay the filing fee; Objections to R&R due by 3/22/2009. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 3/9/09. (djy, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coggins v. Town of Jackson's Gap (MAG+)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Town of Jackson's Gap
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gene Coggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?