Mays v. Multi Service Aviation - US Bank

Plaintiff: Ron Mays
Defendant: Multi Service Aviation - US Bank
Case Number: 3:2009cv00179
Filed: March 5, 2009
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: P.I.: Other Office
County: Macon
Referring Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 11, 2010 50 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting the 40 motion to dismiss and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; denying as moot the 42 motion for summary judgment. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 8/11/10. Furnished to YG, HC & AR (terminates Pretrial Conference 09/22/2010; Non-Jury Trial 10/18/2010) (djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mays v. Multi Service Aviation - US Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ron Mays
Represented By: Juraldine Battle-Hodge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Multi Service Aviation - US Bank
Represented By: Lea Richmond, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?