Leger v. State of Alabama (INMATE 2)
||Leo Daniel Leger
||State of Alabama
||May 21, 2009
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Charles S. Coody
||Ira De Ment
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 9, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: 1) Plf's complaint against Dft State of Alabama be DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii); 2) Plf's claims challenging events which occurred prior to 5/15/2007 be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as Plf failed to file the complaint with regard to these allegations within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitation; 3) Plf's challenge to the val idity of his conviction and/or detention be DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 4) The complaint be DISMISSED prior to service of process; Objections to R&R due by 7/22/2009. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 7/9/2009. (wcl, )
|June 9, 2009
ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $1.66 be paid on or before June 30, 2009; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 and 4 motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ Ventress Corr Facility. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 6/9/09. Furnished to cashier. (djy, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?