Farris v. Forniss et al (INMATE 2)
| Perry Farris |
| Leon Forniss and Troy King |
| 3:2010cv00270 |
| March 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Ira De Ment |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER that petitioner's 14 Motion requesting the court to reconsider its order denying his request to expedite disposition of the instant petition is DENIED based on the reasons stated in 13 Order; that the court notes that this matter is ready for review and a decision shall be rendered within due course as the court's schedule permits. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 6/23/2011. (cc, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER ON MOTION that Petitioner's 12 Motion to Amend Habeas Petition and 12 Motion for Evidentiary Ruling is DENIED as further set out in the order. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 6/15/2011. (dmn)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER that Petitioner shall show cause why his 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should not be denied as it was not filed within the one-year limitation period established by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Show Cause Response due by 5/12/2010. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 4/21/2010. (br, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
