E.C. v. Child Development Schools, Inc.

Plaintiff: E.C.
Defendant: Child Development Schools, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2010cv00759
Filed: September 9, 2010
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Opelika Office
County: Russell
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Coody
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 29, 2011 44 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying the 35 Motion to Strike; denying as moot the 37 Motion to Strike Portions of the Evidentiary Submission; granting the 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/29/2011. (br, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: E.C. v. Child Development Schools, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: E.C.
Represented By: Joseph Wiley, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Child Development Schools, Inc.
Represented By: Keith James Pflaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?