Thompson v. Reeves et al (INMATE 1)
Joseph Thompson |
Paul Brunson and Ben C. Reeves, Jr. |
3:2011cv00288 |
April 15, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Opelika Office |
Russell |
Ira De Ment |
Susan Russ Walker |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER: This cause is now before the Court on Plaintiff's 7 Notice of Appeal, and the 9 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. It is CONSIDERED and ORDERED that the Plaintiff's 9 Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis be and the same is hereby DENIED; and that the Plaintiff's 7 Notice of Appeal be and the same is hereby CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(a), as not taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/15/2011. (dmn) |
Filing 5 ORDER AND OPINION that the 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice in accordance with the provisions set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 5/24/2011. (br, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER ON MOTION Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at the Russell County Jail. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 4/18/2011. (br, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.