Freddie Mac v. Brooks, et al
Freddie Mac |
Homer Brooks, Jr. and Letha Brooks |
Letha Brooks |
Freddie Mac, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., MERSCORP, Inc., PNC Mortgage, Prommis Solutions, LLC, Prommis Solutions Holding Corporation and McCalla Raymer, LLC |
3:2011cv00313 |
April 22, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Opelika Office |
Chambers |
Susan Russ Walker |
W. Harold Albritton |
Rent, Lease, and Ejectment |
12 U.S.C. ยง 1452 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER that Dfts / Counterclaim Plfs shall show cause, if any there be, on or before 8/12/2011, why Counterclaim Dft PNC Mortgage's 34 Motion to Dismiss should not be granted; PNC Mortgage shall have until 8/19/2011, to file any reply it may wish to file, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/29/2011. (wcl, ) |
Filing 47 ORDER that the Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Letha Brooks shall show cause, if any there be, on or before July 25, 2011, why the 46 motion to dismiss should not be granted. The moving Counterclaim Defendants shall have until August 1, 2011, to file any reply they may wish to file. The motion will be taken under submission on that day for determination without oral argument. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/12/2011. (jg, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.