Saint Paul United Methodist Church v. Gulf States Conference Association of Seventh-Day Adventists, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Middle District Saint Paul United Methodist Church v. Gulf States Conference Association of Seventh-Day Adventists, Inc.

Saint Paul United Methodist Church v. Gulf States Conference Association of Seventh-Day Adventists, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Saint Paul United Methodist Church
Defendant:	Gulf States Conference Association of Seventh-Day Adventists, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2011cv00873
Filed:	October 12, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Opelika Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge:	William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit:	Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 31, 2014	Filing 62 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as follows: (1) Summary judgment is GRANTED in St. Paul's favor on its claim for a declaratory judgment that St. Paul has no duty to defend GSC in the underlying action pursuant to the indemnity provision of the Rent al Agreement; (2) Plf's 54 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED on its claim for a declaratory judgment that the insurance policy St. Paul maintained pursuant to the Rental Agreement's insurance provision imposes on St. Paul no duty to defend GSC in the underlying action; and (3) Dft's 58 Motion for Leave to Amend Answer to Assert a Counterclaim is DENIED; A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/31/2014. (wcl, )

Date Filed

Document Text

January 31, 2014

Filing 62 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as follows: (1) Summary judgment is GRANTED in St. Paul's favor on its claim for a declaratory judgment that St. Paul has no duty to defend GSC in the underlying action pursuant to the indemnity provision of the Rent al Agreement; (2) Plf's 54 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED on its claim for a declaratory judgment that the insurance policy St. Paul maintained pursuant to the Rental Agreement's insurance provision imposes on St. Paul no duty to defend GSC in the underlying action; and (3) Dft's 58 Motion for Leave to Amend Answer to Assert a Counterclaim is DENIED; A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/31/2014. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saint Paul United Methodist Church v. Gulf States Conference Association of Seventh-Day Adventists, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saint Paul United Methodist Church
Represented By:	James Lemuel Sanders, II
Represented By:	Joseph Dudley Jackson, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Gulf States Conference Association of Seventh-Day Adventists, Inc.
Represented By:	Kelly Fitzgerald Pate
Represented By:	John Garland Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?